<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AL Runner on Stefan Maron | Business Central &amp; AL Development</title><link>https://stefanmaron.com/tags/al-runner/</link><description>Recent content in AL Runner on Stefan Maron | Business Central &amp; AL Development</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language/><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stefanmaron.com/tags/al-runner/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AL Runner v2: What Feedback Told Me v1 Was Missing</title><link>https://stefanmaron.com/posts/al-runner-v2-emit-through-bc/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://stefanmaron.com/posts/al-runner-v2-emit-through-bc/</guid><description>Last time I wrote about AL Runner , it ran your AL unit tests without a service tier by transpiling AL to C#, renaming BC&amp;rsquo;s runtime types (NavRecord became MockRecord, and so on), and stubbing out anything it didn&amp;rsquo;t recognize. It worked. 3,400 tests passed.
Then the feedback started coming in from companies actually trying to use it, and it was consistent: the runner does what it says it does, for the use cases described.</description></item></channel></rss>